Battle of the 64-bit Budget CPU - Sempron 64 vs. Celeron D 64
AMD Sempron Test System
Processor: AMD Sempron 3000+ (1.8GHz)
Memory: 2x 512MB Corsair DDR-533
Hard Disk: 2x Seagate 7200.9 (Supplied by Seagate)
Motherboard: EPoX 8NPA SLI
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon X800XT Platinum (Supplied by ASUS)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP SP2
Intel Celeron-D Test System
Processor: Intel Celeron D 336 (533MHz FSB) (Supplied by Intel)
Memory: 2x 512MB Corsair DDR2-800
Hard Disk: 2x Seagate7200.9 (Supplied by Seagate)
Motherboard: ASUS P5AD2-E Premium (Supplied by ASUS)
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon X800XT Platinum (Supplied by ASUS)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP SP2
We choose these particular setups as they were somewhat in the higher than average range of the performance specs for both platforms. Intel's Celeron-D was populated with Dual Channel DDR-2 memory, as this is a feature of the provided chipset.
While we did use two modules in the AMD system, they aren't running Dual Channel, since Socket 754 doesn't provide for this feature.
Let's begin our benchmarks and find out which platform offers the best performance.
SiSoft Sandra
Version and / or Patch Used: 2005 SR3a
Developer Homepage: http://www.sisoftware.co.uk
Product Homepage: http://sisoftware.jaggedonline.com/index.php?location=home&a=TTA&lang=en

SiSoft Sandra (System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is a synthetic Windows benchmark that features different tests used to evaluate different PC subsystems.



Here we can see that the Sempron CPU lacks in the synthetic tests compared to the Celeron-D and its Prescott core, however, this isn't a measure of real world power.
Page 4 of 14
Further Reading: Read and find more CPU, APU & Chipsets content at our CPU, APU & Chipsets reviews, guides and articles index page.
Do you get our RSS feed? Get It!



