Join other TweakTown fans on our Facebook fan page!
Technology content trusted by users in Australia and around the world.
Sign up to our newsletterWatch our YouTube channelLike us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter+1 us on Google Plus

4,329 Articles | 23,807 Posts | 76,525 Members
Select Your Edition:USA EditionAU Edition
System
Builders
Guide

REALLY FRESH TECH CONTENT (OUR VERY LATEST STUFF)...

AU EditionYou are located: Home > Gaming > FPS > Crysis PC Review

Crysis PC Review

By: (more) | FPS Content | Posted: Nov 18, 2007 5:00 am
Click to search for the price of this item!Comment | Print | Email | Font Size: AA
Our Rating: 7.5% | Developer: Crytek

Thankfully, Crysis does feature a

 

multiplayer component although the first impression I got from the Gamespy integration wasn't a very good one - I have nothing against Gamespy in

 

general, it just isn't the most reliable online authentication system. Once you do manage to sort out your account and bypass the login and server connection

 

difficulties, the multiplayer gameplay can be quite good. Rather than pack the game full of different modes, Crytek have instead opted to focus on two main

 

multiplayer
modes - Instant Action, and Power Struggle. The Instant Action is self explanatory and is best suited for some quick and simple deathmatch style MP shooting,

 

while the Power Struggle mode is a little more complex, involving the premise of team vs team gameplay with points and locations to capture and objectives to

 

complete. The multiplayer can be quite fun particularly the Power Struggle mode (Instant Action is a little too simple for my liking), but I think its

 

impact on the MP FPS scene will be comparable
to that of Far Cry's - minimal at best because there are just too many other more in-depth MP experiences out there. That's not to say there won't be

 

gamers playing it because I'm sure there will be plenty at least for the first few months after release, just don't expect multiplayer Crysis to take

 

the market by storm.


Of course, perhaps the biggest selling point for Crysis heading up to release with its screenshots and HD gameplay videos was the graphics, and

 

here the game does live up to the hype for sure. The environments can look stunning (although very familiar for Far Cry gamers), and the effects are

 

definitely up there with the best seen in a game

 

to date regardless of platform. However, as we all knew heading towards release, not just any PC will tame the visual beast that is Crysis, you will
need some serious hardware to see this game in all its glory. I'm talking quad-core, high end DX10 SLI sort of stuff here. While this will be quite a

 

convincing positive for those who do have the gear, for the majority of us who are not only more adapt to mid range hardware but not even on Vista,

 

Crysis' visuals won't really be that big of a deal. In fact, getting Crysis to run at a reasonable frame rate on the same hardware I used to

 

review Call of Duty 4 (which I could run at max visuals)
resulted in average visuals at best, without HDR or AA being an option unless I wanted to play in slide show mode. Now, I have a sneaking suspicion that

 

ATI may be partly to blame considering they just released a hot fix to fix some

 

issues (which didn't seem to help me much *shrug*), but in general unless you have a killer PC, the visuals in Crysis don't

 

really stand out much at all. As I said, on the same hardware, COD
4
was able to scale its graphics higher without frame rate issues for me, which again may come back to the likelihood mentioned above that a patch or two

 

will go a long way for this game.


I wouldn't go as far as to say Crysis is a complete disappointment, as it can be a very cool and intense shooter, but it just isn't the

 

genre changing PC platform defining experience it was being made out to be. The graphics, while great, won't be a huge selling point unless you have a very

 

high end PC, and in all honesty the gameplay feels like Far Cry even down to the same old AI quirks. Hell, even the environments look and feel much

 

like Far Cry's. The Nanosuit implementation
and the massive detailed environments produce some very interesting and intense moments but this doesn't save what is otherwise reasonably average FPS

 

gameplay that is regularly buggy and unpolished. I like the open ended approach to the gameplay but its execution just allows too much wiggle room for

 

issues to come to the surface. Like Far Cry before it, Crysis will probably end up being a better tech demo and videocard review center piece

 

than a true GOTY nominee, which isn't a bad fate,
just don't expect groundbreaking gameplay. A definite must have to show off your high end DirectX 10 rig, but otherwise it's basically just Far Cry

 

with a few new bells and whistles.

Crysis 
/pp class=

 


Right of Reply

We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples to express their opinion of our content and thoughts. If any company representative of this product wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.


Page 3 of 3

Prev

Further Reading: Read and find more FPS content at our FPS reviews, guides and articles index page.

TweakTown RSS FeedDo you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Post a Comment about this content


Gaming News Posts

View More Gaming News Posts

TweakTown Web Poll

Question: Diablo III

Game of the Year!

I'm buying it

Not interested / "meh"

What's Diablo III?

BF3 or another game for life!

or View the Results

View More Polls

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Gaming Press Releases

View More Gaming Press Releases