Technology content trusted by users in Australia and around the world.
4,958 Articles | 29,943 Posts
Select Your Edition:  
Tweakipedia
A wealth of
tech information!

TRENDING NOW: Xbox One - Just what is Microsoft thinking?!
AU EditionYou are located: Home > All News > Business, Financial & Legal News > Jury finds Google infringed on Oracle IP in partial verdict, Google moves for mistrial

Jury finds Google infringed on Oracle IP in partial verdict, Google moves for mistrial

By: (more) | Business, Financial & Legal News | Posted: May 7, 2012 8:36 pm

Ah, yes, that legal battle between Oracle and Google is still going on. In fact, it's only in its first stages. The copyright phase of the trial ended Friday with the jury stating they couldn't reach a unanimous decision on one of the four questions it needed to. Judge Alsup told the jurors to think about it over the weekend.

 

jury_finds_google_infringed_on_oracle_ip_in_partial_verdict_google_moves_for_mistrial

 

Unfortunately, this did not help as the jury as it told the court that an "impasse has been reached." The jury then turned in its partial verdict on the three questions that they were able to agree upon. The jury has found that Google did in fact infringe on Oracle's copyrights by copying the structure, sequence, and organization of the code.

 

They were unable to decide if this use would be covered by fair use. The jury found that Google had not unfairly taken from the documentation associated with the 37 APIs. The jury found Google guilty of infringing by actually copying some specific code from the Java programming language. They were only found guilty on one of the three they were charged with.

 

Google has moved for a mistrial given the results of this trial. The trial has now shifted to the patent portion of the proceedings, even with the unresolved portions from the copyright phase. Both Oracle and Google are preparing briefs on the matter of whether the SSO was copyrightable. The jury has been instructed to continue as if they were. However, if Judge Alsup rules otherwise, any subsequent ruling by the jury would be rendered irrelevant.


SOURCE #1

Related Tags



Further Reading: Read and find more Business, Financial & Legal news at our Business, Financial & Legal news index page.

TweakTown News RSS FeedDo you get our news RSS feed? Get It! Got a news tip? Tell Us!

Post a Comment about this news



Check out our
RSS feeds!
  • Upcoming Content: OCZ Vertex 450 256GB SSD Review
  • Upcoming Content: MSI Z77A-GD65 Gaming Series (Intel Z77) Motherboard Review
  • Upcoming Content: HGST Travelstar 7K1000 1TB 2.5" Hard Drive Review
  • Upcoming Content: Western Digital My Passport Edge for Mac 500GB External HDD Review
  • Upcoming Content: PQI Air Card 4GB Wi-Fi SDHC Review
  • Upcoming Content: LaCie CloudBox 1TB Personal NAS Review
  • Upcoming Content: Star Trek: The Next Generation - Season Three (1989) Blu-ray Review
  • Upcoming Content: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012) Blu-ray Movie Review
  • Upcoming Content: Whatever happened to Comodo Time Machine?
  • Upcoming Content: ADATA DashDrive Elite UE700 USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review
  • Upcoming Content: MyDigitalSSD BP4 240GB mSATA Review


Business, Financial & Legal News Posts

View More Business, Financial & Legal News Posts


TweakTown Web Poll

Question: What new stuff are you most excited to see at Computex Taipei 2013?

Cases, Coolers & PSU’s

CPU's

Gadgets

GPU's & Video Cards

Keyboards & Mice

Laptops, Tablets & Phones

Motherboards & Chipsets

New Tech

SSD's & Memory

Booth Babes

or View the Results

View More Polls

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Business, Financial & Legal Press Releases

View More Business, Financial & Legal Press Releases